Heat Load Calculations - Baseline vs High Efficiency

April 10, 2017

Adicot is working on a project for One Community, a non-profit creating open source plans and designs for sustainable cities and homes. The specific project we are working on is assisting in their HVAC Design of their mixed use City Center.

 

The City Center has a few unique characteristics; a root cellar, server rooms, an indoor pool... oh, and it is comprised of three geodesic domes.  

 

 

 

 

The One Community designers have chosen an R-45 insulation for the exterior surfaces of the domes.  With building insulation, equipment loads, and people loads remaining constant, two heat load calculations were performed; a baseline load using International Energy Code minimums and ASHRAE Fundamentals default materials, and a high efficiency (HE) version of the city center.  The HE version included the following changes: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is worth mentioning the benefits outlined below are just analyzing the effect on the heating and cooling systems; but the benefits to building efficiently have much farther reaching benefits.  One example is switching to LED lighting from regular incandescent lighting.  Incandescent bulbs put off more heat than LED bulbs.  THis heat is a form of wasted energy which causes increased demand on the cooling system in the summer.  By switching to LED bulbs, the reduced heat load to the building means lower cooling costs in the summer, means smaller capacity cooling system; also, the bulbs lower power consumption means less energy, which all means a more comfortable building powered by a smaller array of photovoltaic panels.  

 

 

Building Construction

 

A tighter building means greater temperature control.  One Community's City Center prototype building will be in Southern Utah.  The domes are designed for passive cooling during the summer months with backup air conditioning for extreme temperature periods.  The winter lows in Southern Utah can dip into the single digits, so during the winter, to avoid drafts, efficiently maintain comfortable temperatures, and maintain proper building air balance, a tightly constructed building is an even more critical consideration.  

 

Building air tightness is improved by sealing leakage pathways; e.g., ensuring windows and doors are properly installed with weather stripping, sealants, gaskets, etc., and outlets and recessed lights, which often make easy pathways between conditioned and non-conditioned spaces, must be sealed.  A source for more information on this is found on in the Building Technologies Program Air Leakage Guide by the US Department of Energy.  

 

Below are the results of One Community's City Center prototype building in Southern Utah comparing an "average building" (a maximum of 0.17 air changes per hour(ACH) in the summer and 0.32 ACH in the winter) to a "tight building" (a maximum of 0.6 ACH in the summer and 0.12 ACH in the winter).

 

 

 

 

 

Properly sealing the building makes a significant impact on the results of the heating load calculation.  It cut's the impact of outside air infiltration by over 50% for all spaces of the building.  

 

 

Ventilation 

 

A tight building also comes along with requirement for greater attention to ventilation to ensure the comfort and health of the occupants.  Two options when introducing ventilation air into a building are considered for this analysis. The Baseline method is modeled such that the fresh air directly enters the air handling unit's return; the High Efficiency method is modeled such that the outdoor air is pre-treated to 63 degree fahrenheit, before being introducing it into the air handler.  

 

The impact on the heating load is below:

 

 

 

It is not surprising that the burden on the primary heating system is significantly reduced when 63 degree air is introduced versus 8 degree air.   What is not represented here is the energy and equipment needed to pretreat the air to 63 degree.  A dedicated outdoor air system (DOAS) has been recommended as it is specifically designed for this functionality.  A DOAS will have additional upfront, maintenance and operating costs, so this delta is not all savings.  A further more in depth analysis will b e discussed in a follow up blog entry.

 

Fenestration

 

In comparison to some geodesic domes, the glass to wall ratio on this structure is well balanced; this is a sound design choice when optimizing for energy efficiency.  The International Energy Code Table C303.1.3 lists default values for window specifications given their physical characteristics.  The Baseline building was modeled using metal frame, clear, double glazed fenestration (U=0.8, SHGC=0.7).  

 

Since the time of this writing, exact windows have not been specified, Efficient Windows Collaborative's window selection tool was used to select windows with the following U=0.22 and SHGC=0.25.

 

 

As expected, more efficient windows greatly reduce the heat loss of the building to the outdoors.  

 

Lighting

 

The final variable used in  the Baseline vs High Efficiency building comparison is lighting.  As stated earlier, there are a multitude of benefits over and above HVAC equipment sizing when selecting more energy efficient light bulbs.  You can read more about this at One Community's Lighting Analysis.  Since lighting adds heat to the building, inefficiency in lighting burdens the HVAC systems during building cooling.  Below is a comparison on the energy usage for cooling with baseline lighting as dictated in ASHRAE Fundamentals Chapter 18 Table 2 for the various spaces versus the high efficiency building which uses low wattage high efficiency bulbs:

 

 

The graph displays a significant savings for the cooling load by using LED low wattage bulbs versus traditional ASHRAE design standards.  

 

So which do I recommend they implement?  ALL design changes are highly recommended.  It is not possible to emphasize enough the benefits to all three pillars of sustainability, people, planet and profits. Which has the greatest impact to equipment sizing?  The charts below give a representation of the burden each factor places on the system.  It is clear that tempering the outside air* is absolutely necessary (and most likely dictated by local building codes); but all factors show measurable and viable improvements:

 

 

 

 

 

 *All data regarding ventilation will be addressed in an upcoming blog post, and the charts above will be updated to reflect the additional analysis incorporating a Dedicated Outdoor Air System (DOAS).

 

 

 

 

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Featured Posts

Kudos to Local Athletic Clubs!

May 2, 2017

1/2
Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Archive
Please reload

Search By Tags